The ongoing conflict on Capitol Hill may not have been initiated by President Joseph Boakai, but if it persists for a long period, it may require the President’s involvement.
Here’s why: During the Tyler era, when the conflict began, President Sirleaf initially seemed uninterested. However, several accounts suggest that Tyler’s downfall was triggered by his attempts to reshuffle the leadership of the House, which affected influential lawmakers who took this as an affront. As a result, they organized a campaign to oust him.
At first, Tyler tried to demonstrate resilience, but week after week, the situation in the Legislature worsened as the opposition to Tyler grew in number and remained firm. The deadlock in the House began to impede the government’s functions. The issue had to be resolved before any financial bills or other legislation could be introduced. Ultimately, President Sirleaf had to step in and support the faction with the majority to bring relief to her administration.
In the case of President Boakai, this is a new administration with significant goals. By October 30, the national budget is expected to be presented to the Legislature, starting with the House of Representatives. If the current impasse extends into early November, and the major bloc continues to push for the removal of Speaker Koffa, President Boakai may have no choice but to support the faction with the majority.
The government must function, and the budget is an essential document. No president would support delaying the passage of such a crucial piece of legislation. Additionally, there may be other important bills the government needs to present to the Legislature.
In such a situation, President Boakai will likely consider the greater good of the population and may be compelled to sacrifice Koffa. At the moment, there is no indication that the President is directly involved, but he could be forced to intervene if the situation worsens
